Close Menu
cvnznews.com
  • Home Page www.cvnznews
  • About Us
  • Statement of Faith
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact us
What's Hot

‘Take It On The Chin’: How Clerical Language In New Zealand Can Reframe Institutional Abuse

June 2, 2026

Dignified Menstruation Is The Cornerstone Of Gender Equality And Rights

June 2, 2026

Mindanao Village Repeatedly Attacked, Christians Do Not Leave

June 2, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
cvnznews.com
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
cvnznews.com
Home»Opinion»Understanding the $50 boost for working families
Opinion

Understanding the $50 boost for working families

Lindsay MitchellBy Lindsay MitchellMarch 25, 2026No Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Nicola Willis, New Zealand's Minister of Finance
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

OPINION: Lindsay Mitchell

I am not a supporter of government hand-outs. That’s because I am not a supporter of the government taking people’s money by force and deciding who to redistribute it to. That ability confers enormous power on the state. Taxing to redistribute only ever spirals upward. Wherever possible, earnings should be left largely with the earner – not expensively churned by dead weight bureaucracy.

However, this latest ‘rescue’ package raising the In Work Tax Credit (IWTC) by $50 a week makes sense.

It was Helen Clark’s Labour government that introduced the IWTC as part of Working For Families. Its major objective was to get single parents – male and female – into work. Clark and Cullen, the last of Labour’s relatively sensible leaders, stated that the best way out of poverty was work.

At that time, the very really objection to coming off a benefit for a job was that work didn’t pay any better. So the boost from the new IWTC aimed to turn that claim on its head.

Subsequently the employment rate for single mothers has improved significantly (although is still low by OECD standards.).

But the gap between income from a benefit and income from work closed again under Jacinda Ardern’s war on child poverty. The margin is now pretty tight.

For those parents in work, but on low wages or salaries, if the cost of working (eg filling the car) gets too high, they will be at risk of returning to a benefit. I believe that is the major concern driving this highly targeted policy.

So I get it.

But it also proves the point that state wealth redistribution only ever leads to more state wealth redistribution. Where does it end?

NZ, like all expansive welfare states, is now stuck in a ‘Damned if you do and damned if you don’t’ bind.

Related

New Zealand Opinion
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Lindsay Mitchell

Lindsay Mitchell is a welfare reform advocate and stood as an ACT candidate in 2005 and 2008

Related Posts

‘Take It On The Chin’: How Clerical Language In New Zealand Can Reframe Institutional Abuse

June 2, 2026

Where Children Can No Longer Go

June 2, 2026

Why the Nuclear Debate Erupted — Even Though No One Is Proposing a Nuclear Shift

June 1, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

CVNZ News Promo
Don't Miss
Faith

‘Take It On The Chin’: How Clerical Language In New Zealand Can Reframe Institutional Abuse

By Christopher LonghurstJune 2, 20260 Faith

By Christopher Longhurst. A survivor of clerical child sexual abuse in the New Zealand Catholic…

Dignified Menstruation Is The Cornerstone Of Gender Equality And Rights

June 2, 2026

Mindanao Village Repeatedly Attacked, Christians Do Not Leave

June 2, 2026

Tonga Urged to Act as New Report Shows Children Facing Multiple Hardships at Once

June 2, 2026
Can't make a difference
CVNZ News promo
View the latest commentary about todays culture through the lens of the Bible
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfzHynnZrHw&t=54s
The road
CVNZ News – Jesus Illustration Story

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.