Rachel Gilson
Jesus himself says not to judge.” Thus many a conversation about Christian ethics has come to a swift end. I often hear this verse quoted to me in conversations about the Bible’s sexual ethic, especially when these conversations occur in progressive, secular spaces. But it doesn’t take much imagination to guess how it might be deployed elsewhere. When used to shut down conversations, the implicit meaning is something like this: Jesus says it’s wrong to tell me I’m wrong.
Why does it work? For starters, Jesus really did make such a statement: “Judge not, that you not be judged” (Matt. 7:1). Not only did he say it, but it’s recorded in his most famous teaching, the Sermon on the Mount. This is why so many people know it (or some version of it). “Judge not” feels like it’s in the same league as the Golden Rule. So if a non-Christian or a Christian of a different opinion wants to suggest that her stance shouldn’t be opposed, the statement’s pedigree is top-tier.
In the second place, “judge” does carry a meaning of moral discrimination. So it’s not outlandish to think the sentence might be a prohibition on making moral judgments. It’s at least plausible enough that when presented in the heat of a conversation, those who take Jesus and the Bible seriously pause.
On the one hand, the source and the interpretation seem to suggest that whatever moral issue we’re talking about, the only safe landing spot is “agree to disagree.” On the other hand, when we’re in these situations, we retain a nagging feeling that this can’t be what Jesus means. How can we find our way out of the dilemma? By remembering how words work, how context works, and how love works.
How Words Work
Anyone who has taken a foreign language class is familiar with learning vocabulary. We’re often first taught words that have a kind of one-for-one meaning exchange. In English, “good;” in Spanish, “bueno.” But it doesn’t take long to realize that language isn’t just a plug-and-play of word equivalence. “Bueno” really does mean good. It was also the way most of my native Spanish speaking friends answered their home phones growing up. I couldn’t imagine picking up my home phone and just saying “good” in English. But “bueno” was a perfectly ordinary and pleasant way to greet a caller in their homes.
When used to shut down conversations, the implicit meaning is something like: Jesus says it’s wrong to tell me I’m wrong.
Every word has various meanings, and you can only tell which one is most likely from how it’s being used in a sentence (and that sentence in a paragraph). So we’re not at all surprised that “judge” has multiple meanings. One verbal use of “judge” is closely tied to what a judge in a Western courtroom does: render a verdict of innocent or guilty to formally decide a case and bring an open public matter to a close.
Another verbal use is discrimination or considered decision-making. We judge between lighter issues, such as what book to read next or what to wear to an event. But we also make weightier judgments—about whether to marry, what to name our child, how to fulfill an obligation to a parent.
A third use sits somewhat between the first two. It’s to consider what is good, right, or preferable, and not just to keep it to oneself but to state it publicly, especially with the hope of influencing others. As with the second use, this can be for trivial questions, like whether to get pineapple on the group pizza order, or for extremely serious matters, such as a public official speaking on whether a country should go to war.
Helpfully here, the Greek verb krinō has functionally the same meanings as the English “judge.” When Jesus uses the word in his sermon, he can mean various things based on the normal uses of “judge.”
How Context Works
When we consider context, we’re thinking about the various elements necessary to understand meaning. Just as you can’t understand most Gen-Z slang without being heavily online, so you need a variety of contexts to understand Jesus’s sermon. Let’s consider two: literary and social.
Literary context is an extension of what we were thinking about above with words. Just as a word can only be understood in its phrase or sentence, so a phrase or sentence must be situated within its broader literary unit.
Social context refers to the relationships and history that surround any given written communication. This might include information about the original authors and readers, and it might include later audiences who had access to the documents. Think of the song “Your Obedient Servant” from the musical Hamilton. The tragedy and comedy of the song is that it’s an exchange between bitter rivals, one of whom will famously end up killing the other, and yet they sign off their acrimonious letters to each other with increasingly absurd closings such as “I have the honor to be your obedient servant, A. Burr.” The words have a meaning on their own, and yet the social conditions between Burr and Hamilton help listeners know that the sign-off is mere formality, not literal or sincere. The two original gentlemen would have known this, and, the audience of Miranda’s musical knew it too, and with greater depth of irony, since they knew how the story would end.
Both literary and social context play key roles in understanding what Jesus means when he says, “Judge not, that you not be judged.” Starting with literary context, we can see that Jesus’s prohibition against judging can’t be about prohibiting the act of discernment, either privately or publicly. The broad context, after all, is the Sermon on the Mount, where Jesus speaks clearly and repeatedly about sin, righteousness, and the dangers of hell. He’s taking moral action deadly seriously, persuading his hearers to take it seriously too—and so judgment as discernment is required. Do I look at women lustfully? Am I prone to retaliation?
And it’s not merely personal. In the same paragraph as the line about judging, Jesus tells his hearers to remove the speck from their brother’s eye. That is, he’s telling people to get into each other’s business. Discernment is required, especially for the necessary first step of removing the log from one’s own eye.
Both literary and social context play key roles in understanding what Jesus means when he says, ‘Judge not.’
What about social context? More could be said than fits in one short article, but it helps to know that the speaker and the audience are Jewish. That means they share many things, including a religious outlook that requires taking sin, as defined by their covenant God, seriously. Additionally, the sermon frequently mentions hypocrisy related to religious practice, because in that social setting, you earn status for observance.
This gives us crucial information for understanding Jesus’s “judge not” statement. On the one hand, he has a social setting that takes religious observance so seriously that they’re tempted to posture. On the other hand, he also has to warn them that their definitions of sin aren’t nearly serious enough, that they are focused on the outward at the expense of what is happening in the heart.
Taken together, we can reasonably deduce that Jesus wants to raise their moral discernment and lower their tendency to accept or dismiss others based on their religious-observance status. “Judge not” from Jesus can’t mean, “Don’t have a private or public view of what is good or bad.” Rather, it must mean, “Stop declaring yourself innocent and others guilty.” After all, the sentence immediately afterward says, “For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged.”
So where does this leave us?
How Love Works
The worst way this piece could be used is as a slam dunk on the head of someone who wants to use “judge not” to mean, “Don’t tell me I’m wrong.” We know this because Jesus says so: “First take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye” (Matt. 7:5). Correcting another will most often require gentleness; sometimes it will call for firm rebuke. But it always calls for humble, serious self-critique. Love considers how we would want to be corrected, and acts in light of that.
Correcting another will most often require gentleness; sometimes it will call for firm rebuke. But it always calls for humble, serious self-critique.
Others reading this piece, however, might hear Jesus’s warning about the log in our own eyes and not actually deal with their brother’s speck. You were kind of hoping Jesus would say, “Take the log out of your own eye, sit down, shut up, and leave your brother alone.” But no. He says to remove your log so that you can see clearly enough to handle the speck. Love means offering helpful, risky correction, not letting our sibling remain in error.
Usually, when “judge not” is used to shut down moral conversation, it’s asserting that we don’t have the right to correct each other’s views on whatever topic is at hand. But contrary to that interpretation, we need to be deeply concerned with one another, that our view of sin and righteousness aligns with Jesus Christ’s.
Love includes the command “Exhort one another every day, as long as it is called ‘today,’ that none of you may be hardened by the deceitfulness of sin” (Heb. 3:13). The nature of sin is pure deceit, and we’re all susceptible to falling for it. Jesus Christ came full of grace and truth to set us free from sin, death, and lies, and to make us agents for this freedom for others as well. Let’s not judge as if we’re the ones who declare each other ultimately guilty or innocent. Instead, let’s discern together in proper fear and reverence the will of the Lord.
About the Author: Rachel Gilson (PhD, Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary) serves on the leadership team of theological development and culture with Cru. Her writing has appeared at Christianity Today, Desiring God, and The Gospel Coalition, and she regularly speaks at churches and on college campuses. She is the author of Parenting Without Panic in an LGBT-Affirming World and Born Again This Way. She lives in the Boston area with her husband and daughter.
