Skip to content
Close Menu
cvnznews.com
  • Home Page www.cvnznews
  • About Us
  • Statement of Faith
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact us
  • CVNZ News – Affiliate Disclosure
What's Hot

Questions Raised Over Migrant Recruitment Networks and Local Job Opportunities

September 22, 2026

US urges Americans to reconsider Middle East travel over escalation risk

September 22, 2026

ACT Wants to Make Farming Fun Again

September 22, 2026
View the latest commentary about todays culture through the lens of the Bible
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bQVZaC6WdM&t=13s
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
cvnznews.com
Facebook
cvnznews.com
Home»Persecution»China Jailed Him for Faith—NZ Grants Asylum
Persecution

China Jailed Him for Faith—NZ Grants Asylum

Ravi BajpaiBy Ravi BajpaiSeptember 14, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Ravi Bajpai

A Christian man who was detained for about five months after Chinese police raided an unregistered church gathering has been granted refugee status in New Zealand.

The country’s appellate immigration body has ruled the man faces a real chance of being arrested and detained again if he were to return to China and practice his faith through an unregistered church.

“The appellant has already been detained for five or six months simply for going to church,” tribunal member S Benson said in a September 3 decision by the Immigration and Protection Tribunal (IPT).

The man, whose identity is suppressed, was born in China in 1987 and told the IPT he had been exposed to Christianity through his grandmother as a child.

He later worked overseas, where he became involved with a church, before returning to China and attending Christian gatherings held in hotels and private homes.

Click on this link to subscribe today

In February 2022, he said he was among about 40 to 50 people attending a gathering in a hotel when police arrived and arrested everyone.

He said he was questioned about why he believed in Christianity and his involvement with the group. During the interrogation, a police officer reportedly hit him.

He was then transferred to a detention centre, where he was held for five or six months before being released without being charged. Police warned him not to attend further church gatherings and initially required him to report to his local police station once a month.

The IPT said that while China’s constitution provides for freedom of religious belief, “the Chinese Communist Party has a policy to limit and control the practice of religion in China”.

It said religious groups that register with the government are subject to “the intrusive supervision and control” of state religious organisations, the government and ultimately the Communist Party.

The IPT also said the state would “continue to target Christians who attend unregistered house churches in China” through measures including arrest and detention.

The man arrived in New Zealand in February 2023 on a work visa and later began attending an Auckland church, where he was baptised in 2024. His wife and child remain in China.

Immigration New Zealand declined his initial refugee claim, prompting his appeal to the IPT. One issue considered by the tribunal was his relatively limited knowledge of Christianity, but it accepted his faith was genuine.

The IPT said Christians in China who worship outside state-approved churches can face arrest and detention.

It accepted the man would not want to attend a church controlled by the Chinese Communist Party, and said avoiding an unregistered house church would force him to suppress how he chose to practise his faith.

“If the appellant did not attend a house church in China, he would have to suppress his own choice about what constitutes spiritually meaningful religious practice,” the IPT said.

It found there was a real chance he could again be detained if he returned to an unregistered church, potentially for as long as his previous detention or longer because authorities could regard him as a repeat offender.

Since the feared persecution came from the state, the IPT also found there was nowhere else within China he could reasonably relocate to avoid the risk.

“For the foregoing reasons, the appellant is recognised as a refugee,” Benson ruled.

Related

asylum China New Zealand persecution
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Ravi Bajpai

Ravi Bajpai is not-an-award-winning journalist with 20 years of experience in reporting and leading newsrooms across Asia Pacific - India, Hong Kong and New Zealand.

Related Posts

Questions Raised Over Migrant Recruitment Networks and Local Job Opportunities

September 22, 2026By Sarah McMillan/cvnznews.com01 Views

Who makes the law? The Crown answers

September 22, 2026By Roger Partridge01 Views

More than 30 Christians Slain in Plateau State, Nigeria 

September 22, 2026By Partner Media Outlet01 Views
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

CVNZ News App
📱 Download CVNZ News App (APK)
Don't Miss
New Zealand

Questions Raised Over Migrant Recruitment Networks and Local Job Opportunities

By Sarah McMillan/cvnznews.comSeptember 22, 20260 New Zealand

Sarah McMillan/cvnznews.com Questions are being raised about whether New Zealand’s immigration system is operating as…

US urges Americans to reconsider Middle East travel over escalation risk

September 22, 2026

Christians urged not to ‘hide in our church pews’: ‘Roll up your sleeves of obedience’

September 22, 2026

Motorists Slammed by Another Fuel Price Surge

September 21, 2026
New Zealand Christian events gathering and worship
Advertisment

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.